<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why this Diva can&#8217;t get on board the Hillary bandwagon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/</link>
	<description>because a well-behaved diva rarely makes history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:12:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/comment-page-1/#comment-2045</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/#comment-2045</guid>
		<description>Thanks Katie.  Actually, no woman is less of a feminist for being married or for any other life choice.  My post was not about Hillary personally, it is about the suggestion that the mere *act* of electing a (very famous and incredibly privileged and white) woman President strikes a major blow for feminism, because &quot;women are never frontrunners&quot;.  We&#039;re supposed to conveniently ignore that Hillary HAS been the frontrunner for quite some time now and how she arrived at that position.  

That&#039;s only one of several reasons that I found Steinem&#039;s essay offensive, and wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Katie.  Actually, no woman is less of a feminist for being married or for any other life choice.  My post was not about Hillary personally, it is about the suggestion that the mere *act* of electing a (very famous and incredibly privileged and white) woman President strikes a major blow for feminism, because &#8220;women are never frontrunners&#8221;.  We&#8217;re supposed to conveniently ignore that Hillary HAS been the frontrunner for quite some time now and how she arrived at that position.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s only one of several reasons that I found Steinem&#8217;s essay offensive, and wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/comment-page-1/#comment-2043</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/#comment-2043</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t referring to Steinem losing her cred, but Hillary, as you imply she got where she is through the patriarchal institution of marraige. I didn&#039;t read Steinem&#039;s article the same way you did, and I still think you&#039;re a feminist even if you don&#039;t like Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t referring to Steinem losing her cred, but Hillary, as you imply she got where she is through the patriarchal institution of marraige. I didn&#8217;t read Steinem&#8217;s article the same way you did, and I still think you&#8217;re a feminist even if you don&#8217;t like Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/comment-page-1/#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>Katie, I can&#039;t understand where you are getting that idea from what I wrote.  All I can say is that I still consider Gloria Steinem to be a feminist icon, despite her having gotten married recently.    

I don&#039;t appreciate the suggestion that I should lose MY feminist cred for not obligingly supporting Clinton, which is exactly what Steinem is doing in her op-ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie, I can&#8217;t understand where you are getting that idea from what I wrote.  All I can say is that I still consider Gloria Steinem to be a feminist icon, despite her having gotten married recently.    </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t appreciate the suggestion that I should lose MY feminist cred for not obligingly supporting Clinton, which is exactly what Steinem is doing in her op-ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/comment-page-1/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>Because she&#039;s married she loses her qualification as a feminist???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because she&#8217;s married she loses her qualification as a feminist???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Dem Lament</title>
		<link>http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/comment-page-1/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>A Dem Lament</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/01/15/why-this-diva-cant-get-on-board-the-hillary-bandwagon/#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>Great post.  You said all of things I was thinking, but could not quite formulate.  I guess I can throw away my completed post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  You said all of things I was thinking, but could not quite formulate.  I guess I can throw away my completed post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
