<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diva Dispatch for Tuesday.  Catharsis ensued.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/08/27/diva-dispatch-for-tuesday-catharsis-ensued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/08/27/diva-dispatch-for-tuesday-catharsis-ensued/</link>
	<description>because a well-behaved diva rarely makes history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:56:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/08/27/diva-dispatch-for-tuesday-catharsis-ensued/comment-page-1/#comment-7271</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democraticdiva.com/2008/08/27/diva-dispatch-for-tuesday-catharsis-ensued/#comment-7271</guid>
		<description>I agree that those guys were utterly useless last night but Andrea Mitchell definately takes the cake.  Did you see her trying to interview (as if she were a real reporter of something) that 70 something delegate whom she had been sitting next to?  And who&#039;d shed a few tears during the speech? (As did I, and I have always been a Barack supporter.) There was the way she talked to her, as if she was deaf or didn&#039;t speak English.  And not a well spoken party leader and veteran delegate.  I mean the constant repeating of the &quot;Why are you sad?  But why are you sad?  Why were you crying?&quot;  I mean, come on.  That&#039;s how I talk to my 3-year-old.  She couldn&#039;t give up that somewhere, she would find someone who would give her the &quot;scoop&quot; of the convention by actually admitting that yes, Hillary supporters are bitter, they weren&#039;t really in it for anything to do with Democratic principals, and they&#039;re crying because Hillary really deserved the White House.  Maybe this poor unsuspecting, somewhat elderly woman was her best chance?  I am sure Andrea is the one with hearing and comprehension issues that needs to be spoken to like a toddler.  But that&#039;s okay.  She can leave the real thinking to those of us who actually have a brain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that those guys were utterly useless last night but Andrea Mitchell definately takes the cake.  Did you see her trying to interview (as if she were a real reporter of something) that 70 something delegate whom she had been sitting next to?  And who&#8217;d shed a few tears during the speech? (As did I, and I have always been a Barack supporter.) There was the way she talked to her, as if she was deaf or didn&#8217;t speak English.  And not a well spoken party leader and veteran delegate.  I mean the constant repeating of the &#8220;Why are you sad?  But why are you sad?  Why were you crying?&#8221;  I mean, come on.  That&#8217;s how I talk to my 3-year-old.  She couldn&#8217;t give up that somewhere, she would find someone who would give her the &#8220;scoop&#8221; of the convention by actually admitting that yes, Hillary supporters are bitter, they weren&#8217;t really in it for anything to do with Democratic principals, and they&#8217;re crying because Hillary really deserved the White House.  Maybe this poor unsuspecting, somewhat elderly woman was her best chance?  I am sure Andrea is the one with hearing and comprehension issues that needs to be spoken to like a toddler.  But that&#8217;s okay.  She can leave the real thinking to those of us who actually have a brain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

