Stuff like this is why the blog has a category called “Conservative Misogyny”

08 Oct 2009 10:39 am
Posted by: Donna

Via Huffington Post, here’s a list of the 30 Senators (all Republican and including our own Kyl and McCain) who voted against Sen. Al Franken’s amendment that would penalize defense contractors who use mandatory arbitration clauses and other methods to discourage employees from reporting sexual assault:

Franken’s amendment ended up passing, 68-30. Here’s a list of the Senators who showed broad support for Roman Polanski by voting against it:

Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Kyl (R-AZ)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)

ADDENDUM: It’s been pointed out to me that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce lobbied against the Franken amendment as well:

“Republicans point out that the amendment was opposed by a host of business interests, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and applies to a wide range of companies, including IBM and Boeing.”

I guess we must cover up crimes like rape in order to save capitalism.

Lovely. Thanks Kyl and McCain, for standing strong against rape. /sarcasm

Next up, if you thought the abortion bill that just passed in Arizona was an atrocious violation of women’s privacy and dignity get a load of what Oklahoma wants to put women through:

A new Oklahoma law requires physicians to disclose detailed information on women’s abortions to the State’s Department Of Health, which will then post the collected data on a public website. The controversial measure comes into effect on November 1 and will cost $281,285 to implement, $256,285 each subsequent year to maintain.

Oklahoma women undergoing abortion procedures will be legally forced to reveal:

1) Date of abortion
2) Country in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

This might be what we have to look forward to next session, ladies. Could it be any more imperative to win in 2010?

  • Share/Bookmark

10 Comments

  1. Comment by Frank Bing on October 8, 2009 11:28 am

    In addition to Kyl and McCain, I see the list contains upstanding moral beacons like John Ensign and David Vitter. Perhaps their slogan could be, “Do as I say, not as I do.”

  2. Comment by Eli_Blake on October 8, 2009 10:39 pm

    Frank:

    I noticed that too. Yeah, a bill trying to limit sexual harrassment supported by John Ensign. You’d have thought the least he could do is sit this vote out.

    It’s also worth noting that none of the four female Republican Senators (Snowe, Collins, Hutchison and Murkowsky) voted for it (they also abandoned their party in a group of four to vote for the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, and if memory serves me they were either the only four Republican Senators or four of five to vote for that one.) I guess when it’s this bald and blatant even Lisa Murkowski has to realize what they really think about her.

  3. Comment by Eli_Blake on October 8, 2009 10:41 pm

    I should have said OPPOSED by John Ensign.

    What a ringing endorsement.

  4. Comment by Katie on October 8, 2009 11:53 pm

    Eli, I’m really sad that there are only 4 Republican women in the U.S. Senate. And, this amendment goes far beyond limiting sexual harassment. I believe it’s to address the situation where a female employee of Haliburton was gang raped by several co-workers and is not able to take legal action about it.

  5. Comment by Eli_Blake on October 9, 2009 1:22 pm

    Katie,

    Thanks for clarifying.

    The reason why there are only four female Republican Senators is the same reason why after the 2006 election the entire Democratic majority in the House was attributable to the much larger number of Democratic Congresswomen than Republican Congresswomen. It’s because the GOP is still largely an old boys network that women have to fight to succeed in against what is still a glass ceiling. The Democratic party is a lot better about offering support for women who want to run for office.

  6. Comment by Political B!tch on October 9, 2009 6:24 pm

    What I don’t get is how this (the Oklahoma abortion info publication law) isn’t a MASSIVE violation of HIPPA laws. I expect a Supreme Court case within a couple of years. The shame of it is all the women whose private medical information will be exposed between now and the court case(s). Oklahoma has some mighty small towns where I believe it wouldn’t be too hard to figure out who was who on the website list. What a joke!

    Eli, you’re 100% right. In my state, the Dem Party has a program funded at the state party level to encourage women to run for local office, help promote them in their races, and help groom them for the next step up towards national office.

  7. Comment by Donna on October 9, 2009 7:49 pm

    I think it’s a HIPAA violation too. You could easily identify a woman in a small community from that information, but it’s inappropriate in any case. I don’t see it holding up in court.

  8. Comment by Get Real on October 9, 2009 11:33 pm

    I find it amazing that a employment contract supersedes and overrides criminal law. There ought to be a law against drugging and raping someone; we’ve already got that one on the books that nabbed Roman Polanski–we should expand it to cover people whose employment contracts prohibit going to the police and pressing charges against the perpetrators.

    I think Franken doesn’t go far enough. I’m sure there’s female loggers who are raped all the time and have to go to the company arbitrator, who probably goes hunting (or golfing) with the rapists anyways so the poor lady doesn’t stand a chance. Why should women who work for defense contractors get all the protections? Won’t someone think of the ladies on oil rig crews and grocery store produce clerks and miners and Congressional staffers who have to endure the humiliation of filing a claim of being being drugged, raped, and locked in a shipping container (or other confined quarters) through the arbitration process only to be shut down summarily?

  9. Comment by Donna on October 10, 2009 10:03 am

    Get Real, women in those situations are already protected against having to go to arbitration for rape and assault on the job. Even defense contractors stateside can’t force a rape victim to go to arbitration. Defense contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan carved out a unique exception for themselves. They made themselves above the law and

  10. Comment by Donna on October 10, 2009 10:04 am

    (hit post too soon)

    Franken tried to do something about it.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a comment