Comments on: Rush Limbaugh is engaged and I am offended.

By: Paisistratus

Paisistratus — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:08:51 +0000

Marriage. One man. One woman.

Wow. You agree with Pat Robertson.

By: Eli_Blake

Eli_Blake — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:07:15 +0000

You don’t suppose the newlyweds will honeymoon in the Dominican Republic will you? (another google search, ‘Rush Limbaugh’ + ‘Dominican Republic’)

By: Rate Crimes

Rate Crimes — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:39:59 +0000

Age is nothing more than a number, my dear. Furthermore, being “smart” seems to have little bearing on emotional maturity.

Bloat, addiction, and hate are, however, more sound reasons to prohibit a marriage. Ultimately, though, at least in our unbalanced culture, cash overcomes even disastrous genetics.

By: Timmys Cat

Timmys Cat — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:07:36 +0000

I should point out that none of Limbaugh’s previous unions have produced offspring,

Why are my feline senses smelling a beard?

By: Tip Top

Tip Top — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:24:31 +0000

Rush makes a mockery of marriage, and you thought the gays would. Ms. Rogers’ REAL payday will come when her 10-year contract to act as Rush’s beard is over, just like it did for Marta. Like Marta, she won’t even have to live in the same house as Rush. Do a Google search of Limbaugh+gay. Do you think Clarence Thomas will be fool enough to marry Rush again? There’s a risk Rush will take so much Viagra that he’ll lose his eyesight. Then he’ll be both deaf and dumb.

By: Elizabeth Rogers

Elizabeth Rogers — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:59:46 +0000

Marriage number 4 and I have no problem with old guys marrying younger women as long as old women can marry younger guys.

Or if I can perform Donna’s marriage. I likes performing weddings.

By: Eli_Blake

Eli_Blake — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:09:42 +0000

Actually I would suggest a caveat here:

If he’s a horny old (rich) fool (like Rush) then she should be allowed to marry him if they live in a community property state and he waives the pre-nup.

$50,000,000.00 can cure a lot of ills.